Once the ink on the transition was dry, the business turned its attention to the architecture of governance and culture.
One of the most symbolic changes was the redesign of Grapevine’s organisational structure. Out went the traditional vertical chart, in came a more horizontal representation of how work, responsibility, and collaboration flow through the business.
Perhaps the greatest misunderstanding about employee ownership is that it turns a business into a commune. But Grapevine’s new structure didn’t pretend hierarchy didn’t exist, it simply reframed it. The business acknowledged that leadership could happen in any direction, and that ownership isn’t shaped like a pyramid. But EO is a mechanism through which Great EO leadership can flourish, and new leaders can rise from any area of a business.
As Grapevine settled into its new identity, it became clear that additional leadership capacity would help sustain momentum. A Senior Management Team comprising three longstanding colleagues was formed in the second year of the business’ EO. This new team reinforced the board, creating more space for strategic thinking and shared leadership.
Transparency grew, too. The company intranet became a central hub for strategy papers and monthly profit and loss reports. A weekly Monday email, which had initially been a simple update, became a core internal rhythm. And at the end of its first financial year of being EO, Grapevine held its inaugural AGM, giving co-owners a clear, unvarnished view of commercial performance and ESG activity.
Feedback mechanisms were introduced with equal seriousness. Colleagues could raise issues or ideas anonymously or openly, with every submission receiving a considered response from leadership. As survey and group discussions were trialled, participation widened and the sense of shared ownership grew.